Las redes sociales como entorno lingüístico: un estudio de las manifstaciones comunicativas en contextos culturales, lingüísticos y cognitivos
Resumen
Este artículo analiza los aspectos comunicativos de la lengua ucraniana en las redes sociales, en el marco de los procesos más amplios de adaptación lingüística y de formación de la identidad cultural. El objetivo del estudio es rastrear las tendencias en el comportamiento lingüístico de los usuarios ucranianos y sistematizar nuevas formas de discurso multimodal en un entorno glocal. La metodología combina la lingüística de corpus, el análisis del discurso multimodal y el análisis crítico de los textos en redes sociales. La base empírica consta de 40 publicaciones y comentarios auténticos en ucraniano, publicados en 2025 en Instagram, Facebook y Twitter. Los resultados destacan tres procesos lingüísticos y cognitivos clave: la comprensión del habla, con preferencia por la acronimización (35%), la creolización del texto mediante el uso expresivo de emojis (42%) y la integración semántica multimodal en modelos congruentes (48%). El análisis lingüístico y cultural identificó marcadores de glocalización: específicos
nacionales (30%), discursivo-profesionales (28%) y generacionales-subculturales (25%). La tipología de estrategias comunicativas reveló cinco tipos principales, entre los cuales predominan las estrategias informativas (30%) y fáticas (25%). El estudio demuestra el desarrollo de nuevas capacidades lingüísticas y cognitivas entre los usuarios, al tiempo que ilustra la dinámica de la ucranización digital. Muestra cómo las tendencias digitales
globales se adaptan culturalmente a los códigos lingüísticos locales ucranianos, reforzando la identidad y la comunidad.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Bai, Q., Qi Dan, Z. Mu & M. Yang. 2019. A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology 10. 2221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221
Baqir, A., Y. Chen, F. Diaz, S. Kiyak, T. Louf, V. Morini, V. Pansanella, M. Torricelli & A. Galeazzi. 2025. Unveiling the drivers of active participation in social media discourse. Scientific Reports 15. 1847. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88117-x
Benamara, F., D. Inkpen & M. Taboada. 2018. Introduction to the special issue on language in social media: Exploiting discourse and other contextual information. Computational Linguistics 44(4). 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00333
Bernhard, E. 2020. Because Internet: Understanding the new rules of language. Explorations in Media Ecology 19(2). 225–228.
https://doi.org/10.1386/eme_00039_5
Boutet, I., M. LeBlanc, J. A. Chamberland & C. A. Collin. 2021. Emojis influence emotional communication, social attributions, and information processing. Computers in Human Behavior 119. 106722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106722
Caspi, A. & G. Raz. 2020. Using emojis that alter the meaning of written messages to communicate interpersonal relations. Media Psychology 27(4). 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2024.2374778
Di Cristofaro, M. 2024. Corpus approaches to language in social media. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003225218
Garnes-Tarazona, I. 2025. Maurophobia through racist humor in Spanish social media: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Humor 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2025-0032
Hakimov, S. et al. 2024. Processing multimodal information: Challenges and solutions for multimodal sentiment analysis and hate speech detection. In Studies in Computational Intelligence. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64451-1_4
Han, J. & M. Zappavigna. 2024. How emoji make meaning and enact ambient affiliation: A social semiotic account of emoji-text relations in TikTok comments. Social Semiotics 34(4). 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2024.2389520
Hart, C. & J. Marmol Queralto. 2021. What can cognitive linguistics tell us about language-image relations? A multidimensional approach to intersemiotic convergence in multimodal texts. Cognitive Linguistics 32. 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0039
Igwebuike, E. E. & L. Chimuanya. 2020. Legitimating falsehood in social media: A discourse analysis of political fake news. Discourse & Communication 15(1). 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320961659
Jones, R. H. 2021. Multimodal discourse analysis. In Wiley Online Library (Major Reference Works). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0813.pub2
Karjus, A. & C. Cuskley. 2024. Evolving linguistic divergence on polarizing social media. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11. 422.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02922-9
Kennison, S. M., K. Fritz, M. A. Hurtado Morales & E. Chan-Tin. 2024. Emoji use in social media posts: Relationships with personality traits and word usage. Frontiers in Psychology 15. 1343022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1343022
Kerslake, L. & R. Wegerif. 2017. The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i4.1041
KhosraviNik, M. 2022. Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies 19(2). 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1835683
Kopf, S. 2024. Unravelling social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2025.2463622
Kusal, S., S. Patil & K. Kotecha. 2025. Multimodal text-emoji fusion using deep neural networks for text-based emotion detection in online communication. Journal of Big Data 12. 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01062-4
Lehmann, C. 2024. What makes a multimodal construction? Evidence for a prosodic mode in spoken English. Frontiers in Communication 9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1338844
Li, W. & C. Yang. 2018. Pragmatic functions of emoji in internet-based communication: A corpus-based study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 3. 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0057-z
Liu, H., L. Liu & H. Li. 2024. Multimodal discourse studies in the international academic community (1997–2023): A bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241305454
Logi, L. & M. Zappavigna. 2021. A social semiotic perspective on emoji: How emoji and language interact to make meaning in digital messages. New Media & Society 25(11). 2886–2908. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032965
Lungu, M. 2022. The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). American Journal of Qualitative Research 6(1). 232–237.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12085
Mialkovska, L., L. Zhvania, M. Rozhylo, M. Yablonskyy & V. Hrysiuk. 2023. Digital tools in teaching the mass media language. World Journal of English Language 13(4). 43–48. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n4p43
Mialkovska, L., V. Hrysiuk, L. Zhvania, T. Nykoliuk, L. Tykha, L. Sadova & M. Yablonskyy. 2024. Leveraging media and public relations strategies to advance sustainable development: Approaches, frameworks, and tactics in modern conditions. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources 7(3). s253–s269.
https://doi.org/10.33002/nr2581.6853.0703ukr13
Marco, N. D., E. Loru, A. Bonetti & W. Quattrociocchi. 2024. Patterns of linguistic simplification on social media platforms over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 121(51). e2412105121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412105121
O’Halloran, K. L. et al. 2021. Multimodal approach to analysing big social and news media data. Journal of Pragmatics 175. 195–206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100467
Orobchuk, D. 2024. Charting language shift through Ukraine’s social media actors. Canadian Slavonic Papers 66(3–4).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2024.2415177
Racek, D., B. I. Davidson, P. W. Thurner, X. X. Zhu & G. Kauermann. 2024. The Russian war in Ukraine increased Ukrainian language use on social media. Communications Psychology 2(1). 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-023-00045-6
Rüdiger, S. & D. Dayter. 2022. Corpus approaches to social media research: Methods and ethics. Language and Linguistics Compass 16(8). e12459. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003225218
Sun, Y., G. Wang & H. Feng. 2021. Linguistic studies on social media: A bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047572
Tamasny, R. & Z. Gering. 2021. Rich variety of DA approaches applied in social media research: A systematic scoping review. Discourse Studies 24(3). 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043722
Unger, J. 2025. Unravelling social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS) – four approaches to studying social media through the critical lens. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2025.2463622
Vásquez, C. 2019. Language, creativity and humour online. World Englishes 42(1). 78–94. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315159027
Veum, A., M. O. Burgess & K. A. Mills. 2023. Adolescents’ critical, multimodal analysis of social media self-representation. Language and Education 37(5). 482–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2287508
Wang, L. & R. Wang. 2024. Cyber warfare: A study of Zelenskyy’s social media political performance strategies. Frontiers in Psychology 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1478639
Way, L. C. S. & D. Serafis. 2023. Scroll culture and authoritarian populism: How Turkish and Greek online news aggravate ‘refugee crisis’ tensions. Critical Discourse Studies 20(6). 643–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2156568
Wu, B. 2023. Social media critical discourse studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication 41(2). 156–173.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2024.2432430
Yusanto, A. & C. Nugroho. 2024. A critical discourse analysis of the role of influencers in driving social change through Indonesian YouTube content. International Journal of Communication and Society 6(2). 245–267. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijcs.v6i2.1663
Zappavigna, M. & A. S. Ross. 2024. Innovations and challenges in social media discourse analysis (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003257516
| Se encuentra actualmente indizada en: | |||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
![]() |
| ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
| |
![]()
Todos los documentos publicados en esta revista se distribuyen bajo una
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución -No Comercial- Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional.
Por lo que el envío, procesamiento y publicación de artículos en la revista es totalmente gratuito.







